|
| |
|
longde Member Profile Member Since: 2009-04-08 Last Power Points used: 2010-03-04 • Available: now Max Power Points: 1 • Get More Power Points Now Comments |
Subscribe Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 125 Rating:
127 star points#1 Videos: 2 Top 15 Videos: 28 Votes Received: 4154 Average Votes Per Video: 32.71 Votes Cast: 2587 Comments Posted: 873 • browse Comments Applauded: 9 Sifted Videos: 127 Sift Talk Posts: 1 Dead Pool Fixes: 1 Profile Views: 16009 Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos |
In reply to this comment by longde:
*promote
Oh well, feel free to submit it yourself since apparently I'm not allowed. =)
In reply to this comment by longde:
I think that once you reach higher levels (e.g., bronze, silver, gold), you are able post post more types of embeds. I would ask one of the senior members, though.
In reply to this comment by Psychologic:
Hey, how did you get the PeeWee video to embed? I never could get figure out why it told me that the embed was invalid.
I get the same error on another video I've been trying to embed (see below)... any suggestions?
(edit: wtf, why does it work here but won't let me submit it??)
I get the same error on another video I've been trying to embed (see below)... any suggestions?
(edit: wtf, why does it work here but won't let me submit it??)
In reply to this comment by longde:
*promote
I downvoted the comment that it was "just a few seconds". My post including ~40 seconds where Robertson calls the earthquake a blessing your original did not. I did not see your video until SP declared *dupeof, and I was annoyed because they were not the same video, as mine was ~50% longer and had additional content. I was more bothered by the fact that this has happened before and it still isn't fixed.
"Your video appeared almost 2 hours later. My sift must have come up as a dupe; the titles are too similar. You decided to passively aggressively scoop my video with 36 seconds of immaterial content."
This is crazy talk. I think you think I care way more about my sifts way more than I actually do. I have been on this sight long enough that people know I have never done that, if you don't know me it is because my usage has tapered off lately. Irrespective of your conspiracy theory bullshit, SlipperyPete declared dupeof incorrectly. As per the definition of "dupe", it means a copy. If there was black screen or credits something of that degree padding my video, then I would agree it would be a dupe. But it contained ~50% more content and a completely different segment. You know that.
That isn't even the point: the point is dupeof needs to get fixed.
In reply to this comment by longde:
Sorry about the hubbub. I honestly thought the extra seconds were immaterial to the content. I'll keep it in mind in the future.
In reply to this comment by longde:
Hey Pete. Thanks
In reply to this comment by longde:
*dead
I just browsed through a few 30-second bunnies videos, and all but one are dead
In reply to this comment by longde:
Pop Quiz: Do companies have power over my life?
1 - Do you work for a company? Yes/ No
2 - Do you consume goods and services from any company? Yes/No
2a - If yes to 2, do you carry life, health, and auto insurance from any company? Yes/No
3 - Do you consume content (i.e., music, books, video, games, etc) from any company? Yes/No
3a - In particular, did you buy 'Atlas Shrugged' from a company?
4 - Are you a citizen of a country where companies via lobbyists have more influence than you do? Yes/No
4a - In particular, are you a citizen of a country where companies recently convinced the government to give them billions of your tax money? Yes/No
4b - In particular, have you ever lived in a state/city where a company convinced the local government to build a stadium at your (taxpayer) expense, with no promise of a return? Yes/No
5 - Have you ever smelled air pollution, heard sound pollution, seen an eyesore manufactured or produced from a product manufactured from any company? Yes/No
5a - Was this a pleasant experience? Yes/No
6 - Have you or a relative ever been raped by employees of a company, then kept in confinement by the goons of the company, and then prevented to take legal recourse by the lawyers of the company? Yes/No
6a - If so, did US senators, paid and influenced by the lobbyists of the company, vote against your right to take legal recourse? Yes/No
Just off the top of my head.
i want to have your babies
me tooooooo!!!!!!